Page 160 - DOCENCIA E INVESTIGACIÓN, MECANISMOS DE REFLEXIÓN Y CAMBIO EN LATINOAMÉRICA

REDES 02

Den Hamer, A. H. and Konijn, E. A. (2016). Can emotion regulation serve as a tool in combating
cyberbullying? Personality and Individual Differences, 102, 1-6.
Eden, S., Heiman, T. and Olenik, D. (2016). Bully versus victim on the internet: The correlation with
emotional-social characteristics. Education and Information Technologies, 21(3), 699-713.
Erreygers, S., Pabian, S., Vandebosch, H. and Baillien, E. (2016). Helping behavior among adolescent
bystanders of cyberbullying: The role of impulsivity. Learning and Individual Differences, 48, 61-67.
Festl, R. and Quandt, T. (2013). Social relations and cyberbullying: The influence of individual and
structural attributes on victimization and perpetration via the Internet. Human Communication
Research, 39(1), 101-126.
Festl, R. and Quandt, T. (2016). The role of online communication in long-term cyberbullying invol-
vement among girls and boys. Journal of youth and adolescence, 45(9), 1931-1945.
Festl, R., Scharkow, M. and Quandt, T. (2015). The individual or the group: a multilevel analysis of
cyberbullying in school classes. Human Communication Research, 41(4), 535-556.
Docencia e investigación, mecanismos de reflexión y cambio en Latinoamérica
Fisher, B. W., Gardella, J. H. and Teurbe, A. R. (2016). Peer cybervictimization among adolescents
and the associated internalizing and externalizing problems: a meta-analysis. Journal of Youth
and Adolescence, 45(9), 1727-1743.
Frison, E., Subrahmanyam, K. and Eggermont, S. (2016). The Short-Term Longitudinal and Reci-
procal Relations Between Peer Victimization on Facebook and Adolescents’ Well-Being. Jour-
nal of Youth and Adolescence, 1-17.
Gámez, M. and Gini, G. (2016). Individual and class justification of cyberbullying and cyberbullying
perpetration: A longitudinal analysis among adolescents. Journal of Applied Developmental
Psychology, 44, 81-89.
Gianesini, G. and Brighi, A. (2015). Cyberbullying in the Era of Digital Relationships: The Unique
Role of Resilience and Emotion Regulation on Adolescents’ Adjustment. In Blair, S. L., Claster,
P. N. and Claster S. M. (eds.), Technology and Youth: Growing Up in a Digital World (pp. 1-46).
Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Goebert, D., Else, I., Matsu, C., Chung-Do, J., & Chang, J. Y. (2011). The impact of cyberbullying
on substance use and mental health in a multiethnic sample. Maternal and child health journal,
15(8), 1282-1286.
Graeff, E. (2014). Tweens, Cyberbullying, and Moral Reasoning: Separating the Upstanders from
the Bystanders. In Robinson, L., Cotten, S. R. and Schulz, J. (eds.), Communication and Infor-
mation Technologies Annual (Studies in Media and Communications, Volume 8) (pp. 231-257).
Emerald Group Publishing Limited.Heirman, W., Angelopoulos, S., Wegge, D., Vandebosch,
H., Eggermont, S. and Walrave, M. (2015). Cyberbullying-entrenched or cyberbully-free clas-
srooms? A class network and class composition approach. Journal of Computer-Mediated
Communication, 20(3), 260-277.
Heller, J. (2015). The Chat Room Moderator: Creating a Duty for Parents to Control Their Cyber-
bully. Family Court Review, 53(1), 165-179.
Hinduja, S. and Patchin, J. W. (2013). Social influences on cyberbullying behaviors among middle
and high school students. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42(5), 711-722.
Hoff, D. L. and Mitchell, S. N. (2009). Cyberbullying: Causes, effects, and remedies. Journal of
Educational Administration, 47(5), 652-665.

160